How to Prompt Anthropic's Reasoning Models Like Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Let's face it—AI language models have become our digital conversation partners, personal assistants, and even creative collaborators. But like any relationship, communication is key. If you've been using Anthropic's Claude models, particularly the shiny new Claude 3.7 Sonnet, you know that how you ask is just as important as what you ask.

Think of it this way: Claude isn't just any AI—it's that smart friend who needs the right cues to unlock their genius. And when it comes to Anthropic's reasoning models, knowing how to prompt effectively can be the difference between getting a basic response and witnessing some seriously impressive cognitive gymnastics.

We've already covered the general principles of prompting AI reasoning models across different platforms, but today we're diving deep into Anthropic territory—specifically, how to master the art of prompt engineering for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and its reasoning capabilities. Whether you're using standard mode for quick answers or extended thinking mode for those complex problems, I've got you covered.

The Anthropic Family: Know Your Models

Before we dive into the nitty-gritty of prompt engineering, let's get acquainted with the players. Anthropic has developed various models with different intelligence levels—Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus—each designed with reasoning, safety, and information processing capabilities in mind.

Among these, Claude 3.7 Sonnet stands out as a particularly advanced option, representing a hybrid reasoning model that can operate in both standard and extended thinking modes. This dual-mode functionality introduces some nuance to prompt engineering—your approach might differ depending on whether you need a quick answer or a more detailed, reasoned response.

Why Effective Prompting Matters

Crafting effective prompts isn't just about getting a response—it's about guiding the model to produce accurate and relevant outcomes, especially for complex reasoning challenges. Compared to more resource-intensive methods like fine-tuning, prompt engineering offers an agile and cost-effective way to influence model behavior.

It's essentially a scientific investigation—you experiment, observe, and refine until you discover the most effective ways to communicate with these advanced language models. Plus, it's much easier on your wallet than training custom models.

Core Principles for Prompting Anthropic Models

Be Crystal Clear and Specific

When interacting with Anthropic's language models, clarity and specificity are non-negotiable. These models are like highly capable but novice assistants who need explicit guidance. Instead of saying "analyze this," try "identify the three main themes in this passage and provide a specific example of each."

Here are some tips to keep your instructions clear:

• Use affirmative language—"do" instead of "don't"
• Break down multi-step tasks into numbered lists or bullet points
• Provide specific constraints on desired output format and length

For example, rather than vaguely saying "be concise," specify "limit your response to 2-3 sentences." This leaves less room for the model to make assumptions or generate irrelevant information.

Provide Rich Context

Just as humans perform better with background information, Anthropic's models benefit from understanding the purpose, audience, and goals of a task. When working with long documents (exceeding ~20,000 tokens), place this content at the beginning of your prompt, before your specific instructions.

For complex, multi-document inputs, positioning specific queries at the end of the prompt can improve response quality by up to 30%. Strategic organization of information leverages the model's ability to process and recall relevant details.

Leverage XML Tags

Anthropic models are particularly adept at understanding structured information provided through XML tags. Unlike some other language models, Claude models have been specifically trained to recognize and utilize the structure created by these tags, making their use highly recommended.

Common tags include:

• <instructions>
• <context>
• <examples>
• <text>
• <document>
• <user>
• <answer>
• <format>
• <thinking>

The specific names used for the tags are less important than the consistent application of the <> and </> format.

Assign a Role

Setting expectations for Claude's behavior can significantly influence its tone and style. Starting a prompt with phrases like "You are an expert..." or "You are a helpful assistant..." creates a framework for the model's response.

Even more specific roles, tailored to the task at hand, can further refine the output. Remember, the model tends to mirror your tone and style—formal language in the prompt will likely result in a more academic response, while a casual tone leads to a more conversational output.

Show, Don't Just Tell (Few-Shot Prompting)

Providing a few well-chosen examples of the desired input and output format, known as few-shot prompting, can be remarkably effective, especially for complex tasks. Including challenging examples and edge cases further clarifies your expectations.

For maximum impact, structure these examples within XML tags such as <examples>, <example>, <user>, and <answer>.

Prime the Pump with Prefilling

Another useful technique is prefilling, where you provide the beginning of Claude's response to guide its output format. This is particularly helpful when a specific output structure is required, such as JSON or a bulleted list.

By providing the initial tokens of the desired output, you prime the model to continue in that format. This technique can also be combined with stop sequences to explicitly define the end of the desired output.

Mind Your Ps and Qs (Prompt Hygiene)

Attention to prompt quality is essential. Proofreading prompts for errors in capitalization, grammar, and punctuation can positively impact response quality. Additionally, writing prompts in a language you're highly proficient in is recommended, as errors or unnatural phrasing can potentially confuse the model.

Communicating with the model in natural language, as you would with another person, is generally the most effective approach.

Advanced Techniques for Reasoning Models

Chain of Thought (CoT) Prompting

For tasks requiring complex reasoning, the Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting technique can be highly beneficial. This involves explicitly instructing the model to articulate its reasoning process step by step.

Phrases like "think step by step" encourage the model to break down problems into smaller, more manageable parts. Utilizing XML tags such as <thinking> or a designated "scratchpad" area within the prompt can help separate the model's internal thought process from the final answer.

This method often leads to more accurate and coherent responses for tasks requiring logical inference or multi-stage problem-solving.

Prompt Chaining for Complex Tasks

For highly complex tasks, prompt chaining can be particularly effective. This involves breaking down a large task into a sequence of smaller, interconnected prompts. The output from one prompt serves as the input for the subsequent prompt.

This iterative approach enables refinement at each step and allows the model to build upon the context and information generated in preceding prompts. For example, to explain a complex topic, the first prompt might ask the model to identify key concepts, the second to elaborate on these concepts, and the final prompt to synthesize the information into a comprehensive explanation.

‍

Special Considerations for Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet operates in both standard and extended thinking modes, and your prompting strategy should be tailored to the chosen mode.

Standard Mode: Business as Usual

In standard mode, the approach is largely consistent with general best practices for prompting other Claude models. Typically, no specific prompt changes are needed, and you can rely on the techniques we've already discussed—clear instructions, XML tags, few-shot prompting, etc.

Extended Thinking Mode: Let Claude Lead

Extended thinking mode introduces a different paradigm. Unlike traditional CoT prompting, where you explicitly guide the reasoning steps, when using Sonnet 3.7's extended thinking, it's recommended to initially remove any explicit chain-of-thought instructions from the prompt.

Instead, start with general, high-level instructions that encourage the model to think deeply about the task. Observe the model's natural thought process in response to these instructions, then adjust your prompts based on what you observe.

If specific guidance is still needed, provide it in natural language, which the model can then integrate into its own thinking process. It's also important to allocate a sufficient token budget to allow the model to fully process the instructions and carry out its extended thinking.

This approach encourages the model to leverage its advanced reasoning abilities more autonomously. In fact, simplifying prompts for Sonnet 3.7 is often beneficial, as the model requires less explicit steering.

Optimizing for Long Context

Anthropic's models, particularly the Claude 3 family, boast impressive context windows—up to 200,000 tokens for Claude 3 models. To effectively utilize this capacity, strategically structure your prompts containing large amounts of text.

Place long-form content at the very beginning of the prompt, above any specific queries, instructions, or examples. When dealing with multiple documents, structure the content and metadata using XML tags, wrapping each document within <document> tags and using subtags for content and metadata.

For tasks involving specific information extraction from long documents, explicitly ask Claude to first identify and quote relevant sections before answering the main query. Instructing the model to place these excerpts within <quotes> tags helps it focus on pertinent parts of the text.

Scalability Through Templates and Variables

For consistency and efficiency, especially in applications where similar prompts are used repeatedly, adopt prompt templates and variables. Templates provide a fixed structure for common tasks, while variables serve as placeholders for dynamic content that changes with each request.

These placeholders are typically denoted using double brackets, such as {{user_input}}, making them easily identifiable and allowing for quick testing with different values. This approach simplifies adapting prompts to various scenarios without rewriting the entire prompt each time.

Common Mistakes and Troubleshooting

Avoiding Ambiguity

One of the most common pitfalls is using ambiguous or vague instructions. To avoid this, be as clear and specific as possible. Provide contextual information, explicitly state what the model should do, and break down instructions into sequential steps.

A useful practice is to share your prompt with someone unfamiliar with the task to check for clarity; if they find it confusing, Claude likely will too.

Addressing Potential Inaccuracies

While Anthropic models are known for their safety and reduced tendency to produce incorrect information, ensuring accuracy is still important. For complex tasks, breaking down instructions into numbered steps and allowing sufficient processing time in extended thinking mode can help.

Asking the model to verify its work or run through test cases, especially for coding-related tasks, can also enhance accuracy. When the answer should be grounded in provided documents, explicitly instructing the model to quote relevant sections can help mitigate the risk of generating unsubstantiated claims.

Embrace the Iterative Process

Prompt engineering is fundamentally an iterative process. Achieving optimal results often requires experimentation, evaluation, and refinement based on performance.

Consider generating multiple test cases to systematically assess the effectiveness of different prompting strategies. This continuous cycle of testing and improvement is key to mastering the art of prompting Anthropic's reasoning models.

Conclusion: The Art of the Prompt

Effective prompting of Anthropic's reasoning models, particularly Claude 3.7 Sonnet, combines fundamental principles with advanced techniques. Clarity, specificity, strategic use of context, XML tags, roles, examples, and prefilling are foundational to achieving desired outcomes.

For Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifically, understanding when to use standard versus extended thinking mode, simplifying prompts, and managing token usage are key considerations. By avoiding ambiguity, addressing potential inaccuracies, and embracing an iterative approach, you'll master the art of prompting these advanced language models for optimal results.

Remember, prompting is as much an art as it is a science—and sometimes, the best way to learn is simply to experiment and see what works for your specific use case.

FAQ: Prompting Anthropic's Reasoning Models

Q1: What's the difference between Claude 3.7 Sonnet's standard and extended thinking modes?

A: Standard mode provides direct and efficient responses using clear and direct instructions, similar to previous Claude models. Extended thinking mode enables deeper reasoning with a transparent thought process, using general instructions that encourage deep thinking rather than explicit step-by-step guidance. The extended mode requires less user control initially but may need a larger token budget for complex tasks.

Q2: How should I structure my prompts when working with long documents in Claude?

A: Place long-form content (20,000+ tokens) at the beginning of your prompt, before any specific queries or instructions. When working with multiple documents, use XML tags to structure content and metadata. For complex inputs with multiple documents, place specific instructions at the end of the prompt—this can improve response quality by up to 30%. For information extraction, explicitly ask Claude to identify and quote relevant sections before answering.

Q3: What are the most effective techniques for complex reasoning tasks?

A: For standard mode, Chain of Thought (CoT) prompting is effective—explicitly instruct Claude to show its reasoning step by step using phrases like "think step by step" and XML tags like <thinking>. For extended thinking mode, start with general instructions that encourage deep thought without explicit CoT guidance, observe the model's natural reasoning process, and refine prompts based on what you observe. For highly complex tasks, consider prompt chaining—breaking down large tasks into sequences of smaller, interconnected prompts.

Q4: How can I ensure consistency when using Claude for similar tasks repeatedly?

A: Use prompt templates with a fixed structure for common tasks, and incorporate variables as placeholders for dynamic content (typically denoted with double brackets like {{user_input}}). This approach improves efficiency, ensures consistent structure, facilitates testing different inputs, enhances scalability, and enables easier version control of prompt structures.

Q5: What are the most common mistakes when prompting Claude, and how can I avoid them?

A: Common mistakes include using ambiguous or vague instructions, not providing enough context, and expecting perfect accuracy without verification steps. To avoid these, be clear and specific in your instructions, break down complex tasks into sequential steps, provide relevant contextual information, ask the model to verify its work for complex tasks, and adopt an iterative approach to prompt refinement—test, evaluate, and improve your prompts based on Claude's performance.

‍

The Ultimate Guide to Prompting Google's Reasoning Models

Ever felt like you're talking to a wall when trying to get AI to solve complex problems? You're not alone. Google's reasoning models are game-changers, but knowing how to speak their language makes all the difference. If you've already checked out our general overview on prompting AI reasoning models, you'll know the basics—but today we're diving deep into Google's unique approach.

Why Google's Reasoning Models Are Worth Your Time

The AI landscape has evolved rapidly, with Google developing sophisticated systems that don't just pattern-match but actually reason through complex problems. These models—especially the Gemini family—are designed to handle everything from code generation to mathematical challenges with impressive inferential capabilities.

Google's flagship reasoning model, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental, is specifically designed to showcase its thought process as it tackles multimodal tasks. This isn't your average AI—it's built for heavy intellectual lifting.

Let's take a quick look at the star players in Google's reasoning roster:

From Basic to Advanced: A Prompting Progression

Foundational Techniques: Starting Simple

If you're new to this, start with these basic approaches before trying the fancy stuff:

1. Zero-Shot Prompting: Just ask the model directly without examples. For instance: "Explain quantum entanglement and its implications for computing." The model will use its pre-trained knowledge to respond. This works best when the task is straightforward.
2. Few-Shot Prompting: Show the model a couple of examples of what you want. If you're asking for product descriptions, provide 2-3 examples with the tone and format you're looking for. This technique is especially useful when you need a specific style or structure in the response.
3. Instruction-Based Prompting: Be crystal clear about what you want. Instead of "Write about AI," try "Write a 300-word explanation of how Google's reasoning models differ from traditional language models, focusing on their ability to solve complex mathematical problems." The more specific your instructions, the better the results.

Advanced Strategies: Unlocking Deeper Reasoning

Ready to level up? These techniques are where Google's reasoning models really shine:

1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Prompting: Encourage the model to show its work. Add "Let's think step by step" before your question. This technique works wonders for complex problems where you want to see the reasoning process. For example, when solving a multi-step math problem, this approach helps the model break down its thinking.However, there's an interesting twist here: some research suggests that for Google's most advanced reasoning models, overly verbose CoT instructions might not be necessary—or could even be counterproductive. These models already have strong inherent reasoning capabilities.
2. Tree-of-Thought (ToT) Prompting: This technique allows the model to explore multiple solution paths simultaneously. Rather than following a single chain of reasoning, the model branches out, evaluates different approaches, and prunes less promising ones—similar to how a chess player might consider various moves.
3. SELF-DISCOVER: This cutting-edge framework from Google DeepMind is the cool kid on the block. It lets the model autonomously identify and compose its own reasoning structures. In the first stage, it selects appropriate reasoning modules and creates a plan. Then it applies this self-discovered structure to solve the problem. Studies show this approach can improve performance by up to 32% on challenging reasoning benchmarks.

‍

Google's Own Recommendations: Straight from the Source

Google has been pretty forthcoming about how to get the most from their reasoning models. Here's what they suggest:

Be Crystal Clear

Ambiguity is your enemy. Define exactly what you want, any constraints, and the desired format. For example, instead of "Summarize this document," try "Summarize this scientific paper in five bullet points, highlighting the methodology, key findings, and limitations."

Show, Don't Just Tell

Few-shot examples work wonders with Gemini models. If you want the model to write in a particular style or format, show it 2-3 examples first. This is particularly effective for creative writing, technical analysis, or any task with a specific output structure.

Context Is King

The more background information you provide, the better. When asking for a marketing strategy, don't just request ideas—mention your target audience, product features, competitors, and goals. This contextual information helps the model generate more relevant and tailored responses.

Use Prefixes and Partial Inputs

Simple prefixes like "Translate to Spanish:" or "Debug this code:" can effectively signal what you want. Similarly, starting a sentence and letting the model complete it can yield creative results: "The three most important factors in optimizing machine learning models are..."

Break Complex Tasks into Smaller Chunks

For complicated projects, use prompt chaining—breaking the task into a sequence of smaller prompts, with each output feeding into the next. Planning an event? First, ask for a task list, then break down each task, then prioritize them. This approach gives you more control and often produces better results.

Here's a handy reference for Google's recommended strategies:

What Works Best? Real-World Evidence

Research papers and community feedback offer interesting insights into what actually works with Google's reasoning models:

Benchmark Findings

Quantitative benchmarks show that Gemini Ultra achieves exceptional results on tests like MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) when combined with chain-of-thought prompting and self-consistency techniques. However, the gains from these techniques vary by task and model.

Interestingly, some research suggests that for certain Gemini models, minimal zero-shot prompts might be just as effective as more elaborate prompting strategies. This highlights the importance of understanding each model's strengths.

Community Discoveries

The developer community has shared some interesting "hacks" for improving Gemini's reasoning abilities—like instructing the model to "think in more than 32 steps" for complex questions. However, the community has also noticed that some traditional prompting tricks that work well with other models might not yield the same improvements with Gemini.

This reinforces the idea that Google's reasoning models have their own unique characteristics and may require a different approach than what works for other AI systems.

Tools to Help You Master Google's Reasoning Models

Google offers two main platforms for developing and testing prompts:

Google AI Studio

This user-friendly web-based platform is perfect for rapid experimentation. It offers interfaces for both chat and structured prompts, along with features for tuning models with your own data. The platform also includes prompt galleries and examples to inspire your own prompting strategies.

Vertex AI

For more advanced users, Vertex AI provides comprehensive capabilities for building, deploying, and managing AI applications. Its Prompt Optimizer service automatically tests different prompt variations to find the most effective approach. It also offers model tuning and robust safety settings.

Best Practices: Getting the Most from Google's Reasoning Models

Choose the Right Model for the Task

Different models have different strengths. Gemini 2.0 Flash is a great workhorse for everyday tasks, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental excels at showing its reasoning process. Match your prompt style to the model's architecture—what works for one may not work for another.

Iterate, Iterate, Iterate

Effective prompting is rarely a one-shot process. Be prepared to experiment with different phrasings, adjust the context, or try various techniques to find what works best. Platforms like Google AI Studio make this iteration process much easier.

Avoid Common Pitfalls

Remember that even reasoning models have limitations. Don't rely solely on them for factual information without verification, as they can sometimes generate inaccurate content. And while they're designed for complex reasoning, their performance can vary based on how you frame the question.

The Future of Prompting Google's Reasoning AI

The field is evolving rapidly, with new techniques like SELF-DISCOVER pointing toward more autonomous reasoning capabilities. As models continue to advance, we're likely to see even more intuitive ways of interacting with AI systems—perhaps moving beyond traditional prompting altogether.

For now, mastering the art of prompting Google's reasoning models gives you a powerful tool for tackling complex problems, from mathematical challenges to sophisticated research analysis.

FAQ: Prompting Google's Reasoning Models

Q1: Which Google reasoning model should I use for complex mathematical problems?

A: Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental is specifically designed for tasks requiring detailed reasoning, including mathematics and physics. It breaks down complex problems and shows its thinking process, making it ideal for mathematical challenges.

Q2: Do Google's reasoning models need extensive chain-of-thought prompting?

A: Interestingly, not always. While chain-of-thought prompting can improve results, some research suggests that Google's advanced reasoning models may have strong inherent reasoning capabilities, and overly verbose instructions might not always be necessary. Simple, clear prompts often work well.

Q3: How does SELF-DISCOVER differ from traditional prompting methods?

A: SELF-DISCOVER is a two-stage framework where the model first autonomously identifies appropriate reasoning modules and creates a plan, then applies this self-discovered structure to solve the problem. Unlike traditional methods where reasoning steps are guided by the prompt, SELF-DISCOVER empowers the model to develop its own reasoning approach, often leading to better performance while using fewer computational resources.

Q4: What's the best way to improve my prompting skills for Google's reasoning models?

A: The most effective approach is iterative experimentation using platforms like Google AI Studio. Start with clear, specific instructions and relevant context, then progressively refine your prompts based on the responses you receive. Google's documentation and prompt galleries also provide valuable examples and best practices.

Q5: Can Google's reasoning models handle multimodal inputs?

A: Yes, models like Gemini 2.0 Flash and Gemini 1.5 Pro support multimodal inputs, including text, images, audio, and video. This allows for more comprehensive understanding and analysis of complex information across different formats.

‍

‍

How To Prompt OpenAI's Reasoning Models: The Ultimate Guide

OpenAI's o1 and o3-mini aren't just your average AI models—they're the heavy hitters of the reasoning world. These models take a different approach, methodically working through problems rather than simply generating text. Think of it as the difference between someone giving you a quick answer versus walking you through their thought process. But here's the twist: the prompting strategies that work for standard language models often fall flat with these analytical powerhouses.

If you've been struggling to get optimal results from these models, you're not alone. The techniques that work for conventional language models can actually hinder performance with reasoning models. In this guide, I'll walk you through the essentials of effective prompting for OpenAI's reasoning models, drawing from recent research and best practices.

(For a broader perspective on reasoning models across different platforms including Google and Anthropic, check out my previous article on prompting AI reasoning models.)

Understanding OpenAI's Reasoning Models: o1 and o3-mini

Before diving into prompting strategies, let's get clear on what makes these models special. OpenAI's o3 and o1 model families are engineered to tackle complex tasks with a deliberate, multi-step thought process. They allocate more computational resources to problem-solving and engage in deeper analytical thinking than standard LLMs.

The key difference between reasoning models and standard LLMs? While standard language models primarily function as "next-token predictors," reasoning models incorporate mechanisms for more deliberate, multi-step inference, logical deduction, and self-verification. Some even employ built-in "chain-of-thought" processing and self-fact-checking without explicit instructions.

The o3-mini Model

The o3-mini model offers a faster, more affordable reasoning option with an adjustable reasoning effort parameter (low, medium, or high) that lets you balance speed and accuracy based on your task's complexity. It demonstrates particular strength in STEM-related reasoning and coding tasks.

The o1 Model Family

The o1 models (including o1 and o1 Pro) are engineered for deep, methodical, multi-step reasoning. They can outperform even GPT-4o in specialized domains like complex mathematics but come with slower processing speeds and higher costs. It's worth noting that o1 models might have an edge in creative writing and linguistically demanding tasks compared to o3-mini.

The "Less is More" Principle for Reasoning Models

Perhaps the most counterintuitive aspect of prompting reasoning models is that simpler is often better. According to OpenAI's prompting guide, these models perform best when provided with clear, direct instructions. The mantra is "trust the model's inherent reasoning abilities."

This approach contrasts sharply with prompting strategies for standard LLMs, where detailed instructions often yield better results. With reasoning models, over-complicating your prompt with excessive instructions can actually confuse the model and hinder its built-in reasoning capabilities.

For instance, a prompt like "Analyze the dataset and provide key insights" is often more effective than "Can you analyze this dataset step by step, explain your reasoning at every stage, and ensure that the answer aligns with best practices in statistical analysis?"

What to Avoid When Prompting Reasoning Models

Several popular prompting techniques for standard LLMs can actually degrade performance with reasoning models:

1. Avoid Explicit "Think Step by Step" Instructions

Perhaps surprisingly, OpenAI advises against explicitly instructing their reasoning models to "think step by step" or to "explain their reasoning." These models are already optimized for logical reasoning, and adding such instructions can sometimes hinder rather than help.

Explicitly telling a reasoning model to "think" is redundant because this is a fundamental aspect of their design. It can even interfere with their optimized internal flow, potentially leading to less efficient outputs.

2. Limit Few-Shot Examples

While few-shot prompting (providing several examples in the prompt) is often beneficial for standard LLMs, it can reduce the performance of reasoning models. It appears that additional context from multiple examples can overwhelm the model's inherent reasoning capabilities.

The recommendation? Start with zero-shot prompting (giving the task without examples), and if the initial output doesn't meet expectations, incorporate just one or two highly relevant and simple examples.

Best Practices for Prompting OpenAI's Reasoning Models

Now that we've covered what to avoid, let's focus on strategies that actually enhance performance:

1. Use Delimiters for Complex Inputs

When providing complex inputs such as multiple questions, formatted text, or structured data, use delimiters to clearly mark the beginning and end of different sections. Effective delimiters include triple quotation marks ("""), XML tags, or section titles.

This helps the model correctly interpret the structure of your request and reduces the risk of misinterpretation.

2. Be Strategic with Context in RAG Applications

For retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) tasks, provide only the most relevant context to the model. Overloading with excessive background information can dilute accuracy by making it harder for the model to focus on key information.

This is particularly important for reasoning models, as providing a focused set of relevant documents allows the model to concentrate its reasoning on the most pertinent data.

3. Clearly State Constraints and Goals

If your request has specific constraints (budget, timeframe, methodology) or a particular goal, clearly state these in the prompt. The clearer your constraints and desired end goal, the more tailored the model's response will be.

This provides necessary boundaries for the reasoning model to operate within, enabling it to generate solutions aligned with your requirements.

‍

‍

The Trade-Off: Which Model to Use When

Deciding which model to use involves carefully considering the trade-offs between cost, speed, and capabilities:

• For simpler tasks, standard models like GPT-4o may be more efficient and cost-effective.
• The o1 models, while highly capable in complex reasoning, tend to be slower and more expensive.
• The o3-mini model offers a faster and more affordable reasoning option, though it might have a narrower knowledge base.

OpenAI suggests that GPT-4o remains optimal for most general prompts, with the o1 models best reserved for truly challenging problems in specialized domains.

Expert Prompting Strategies for Specific Applications

Now let's explore how to optimize prompts for these reasoning models across different applications.

Data Analysis with Reasoning Models

Both o3-mini and o1 offer significant potential for complex data analysis tasks. Here are some effective prompt examples:

• For Summarizing Data: "Analyze the following dataset [insert data] and summarize the key trends and insights. Focus on identifying any significant patterns or anomalies."
  
  
• For Identifying Correlations: "Given the dataset [insert data], determine if there are any statistically significant correlations between [variable 1] and [variable 2]. Explain your reasoning."
  
  
• For Generating Visualization Code (o3-mini): "Generate Python code using pandas and matplotlib to create a scatter plot of [variable X] vs. [variable Y] from the following data [insert data]. Add appropriate labels and a title."
  
  
• For Comparative Analysis (o1): "Compare the sales performance of product A and product B based on the following data [insert data]. Identify the key differences and provide a rationale for any observed trends."
  
  

When choosing between models for data analysis, consider that o3-mini excels in faster analysis and STEM-focused tasks, while o1 is better suited for complex analysis with high accuracy requirements.

Copywriting with Reasoning Models

For copywriting tasks, both models benefit from clear instructions regarding tone, style, format, and target audience. Some effective prompt examples include:

• For Product Descriptions (o3-mini): "Write a compelling product description for [product name] highlighting its key features and benefits for [target audience]. Use a [tone] tone and keep it under [word count] words."
  
  
• For Headline Generation (o1): "Generate 10 attention-grabbing headlines for a blog post about [topic]. The headlines should be concise and encourage clicks."
  
  
• For Social Media Captions (o3-mini): "Create three engaging Instagram captions for a post promoting [product/service]. Focus on [key selling point] and include relevant hashtags."
  
  

When deciding between models for copywriting, consider using o1 for tasks requiring more nuanced creative writing or complex persuasive arguments, while o3-mini can be better for faster generation with clear instructions.

SEO Strategy with Reasoning Models

Both model families can be valuable for developing and analyzing SEO strategies. Some effective prompt examples include:

• For Keyword Research (o3-mini): "Suggest 20 relevant keywords, including long-tail keywords, for a website selling [product/service]. Organize them by search intent."
  
  
• For Content Optimization (o1): "Analyze the following blog post [insert text] and provide specific recommendations for on-page SEO optimization, including title tag, meta description, and header tags. The target keyword is [keyword]."
  
  
• For Link Building Strategy (o1): "Outline three actionable link building strategies for a website in the [industry] niche. Focus on ethical and sustainable approaches."
  
  

For SEO strategy, consider using o1 for complex strategic planning and in-depth content analysis, while o3-mini can be valuable for faster keyword research and initial SEO audits.

Advanced Techniques for Maximum Performance

Beyond the basic guidelines, several advanced techniques can further enhance the reasoning capabilities of these models:

1. Selective Use of Reasoning Explanations

While generally discouraged for these models, explicitly requesting explanation of reasoning can sometimes provide valuable insights, especially for complex scenarios.

2. Persona Prompting

Having the model adopt the role of an expert in a specific domain—like an experienced data analyst or SEO strategist—can help tailor outputs to a particular perspective.

3. Strategic Problem Decomposition

Even though these models perform internal decomposition of complex tasks, breaking down problems into simpler subtasks within the prompt can sometimes guide the model toward a specific line of reasoning.

4. Iterative Refinement

The process of refining prompts based on initial responses is crucial for achieving desired detail and accuracy. Don't be afraid to iterate on your prompts to get better results.

Practical Comparisons: o3-mini vs. o1

To help you choose the right model for your needs, here's a comparative overview of o3-mini and o1 across different applications:

Conclusion: Effective Prompting is Both Art and Science

Prompting OpenAI's o3 and o1 reasoning models effectively requires a nuanced understanding of their strengths and limitations. The "less is more" principle generally applies, emphasizing clear, direct instructions and avoiding explicit chain-of-thought or excessive few-shot examples.

Remember that specific strategies vary slightly between the model families. The o3-mini model benefits from leveraging its adjustable reasoning effort and excels in STEM-related tasks, while the o1 models are designed for deeper, more methodical reasoning in complex scenarios.

As with all AI prompting techniques, experimentation and iterative refinement remain key to unlocking the full potential of these powerful reasoning models. Don't be afraid to try different approaches and see what works best for your specific use case.

By following these guidelines, you'll be well on your way to harnessing the full power of OpenAI's reasoning models, getting more accurate, relevant, and well-reasoned outputs for your complex tasks.

‍

The Art of Prompting AI Reasoning Models: A Masterclass

If you've been wrestling with AI models lately, you might've noticed a new breed entering the arena: reasoning models. These aren't your garden-variety language models—they're the chess players of the AI world, built to think several moves ahead. Understanding how to prompt them effectively is the difference between getting a mediocre response and unlocking their full problem-solving potential.

Let's dive into how to master prompting for these next-gen AI systems from the major players: OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic.

Why are Reasoning Models Different?

Reasoning models like OpenAI's o1 and o3-mini, Google's Gemini 2.0 Series, and Anthropic's New Claude 3.7 with “hybrid-reasoning” are engineered differently from standard LLMs. The difference? They're designed to actually think—or at least simulate thinking far more convincingly than their predecessors.

While standard LLMs are essentially "next-token predictors" that guess the most probable next word based on training patterns, reasoning models incorporate mechanisms for deliberate, multi-step inference and self-verification. They allocate more computational resources and time to mull over complex problems, mimicking human analytical processes.

As one analysis puts it, these models "effectively mimic a human's analytical thought process," a stark contrast to the faster, more direct response generation typical of standard LLMs. Some reasoning models, like OpenAI's o1, even perform "self-fact-checking" during response generation, internally verifying details to improve factual accuracy—a feature not commonly found in standard LLMs without specific prompting.

The Platform Showdown: How Prompting Differs Across the Big Three

Here's where things get interesting. Each AI provider has developed their own philosophy on how their reasoning models should be prompted. Let's break it down by company.

‍

OpenAI's Minimalist Approach to Prompting Reasoning Models

OpenAI's guidance for their reasoning models (o1, o3-mini) is surprisingly minimalist: keep it simple and direct. Their models perform best when you don't overcomplicate things with excessive instructions.

The key takeaway? Trust the model's inherent reasoning abilities rather than trying to micromanage its thought process. For example, "Analyze the dataset and provide key insights" works better than "Can you analyze this dataset step by step, explain your reasoning at every stage, and ensure that the answer aligns with best practices in statistical analysis?"

Counterintuitively, OpenAI advises against explicitly instructing their reasoning models to "think step by step" or "explain their reasoning"—techniques that are popular with standard LLMs. Their reasoning models are already optimized for logical reasoning, and adding such instructions can sometimes hinder performance rather than improve it.

As Microsoft's technical community notes, it's better to reserve "think step-by-step" prompts for standard models like GPT-4o, where they tend to have a more positive impact.

‍

Google's Gemini: Structure and Examples

Google's approach for Gemini models emphasizes clarity and structure. They recommend clearly defining the task, specifying constraints, and defining the desired format of the response.

Unlike OpenAI, Google strongly recommends including a few examples in the prompt to demonstrate the desired output format or reasoning pattern. These examples help Gemini understand what "getting it right" looks like and can regulate its responses.

Google also suggests using prefixes to signal semantically meaningful parts of the input, such as "Question:", "Explanation:", and "Answer:" to improve the model's understanding of complex tasks.

For intricate reasoning problems, Google recommends breaking them down into smaller, more manageable steps—either using separate prompts for different parts of the task or chaining prompts where the output of one becomes the input of the next.

‍

Anthropic's Claude: Structured Thinking

Anthropic takes yet another approach with Claude, actively encouraging chain-of-thought prompting to improve its reasoning abilities. They recommend prompting Claude to break down complex problems into smaller, step-by-step components, which leads to more accurate outputs, especially for tasks involving math, logic, or complex analysis.

A distinctive feature of Anthropic's prompting strategy is the use of XML tags to structure both the input and the desired reasoning process. They recommend using tags like <thinking> and <answer> to explicitly separate the reasoning process from the final answer.

As Anthropic's documentation states, this technique leads to "more accurate and nuanced outputs" for complex reasoning tasks. Like Google, Anthropic also strongly recommends including examples in prompts to show Claude the desired format and style of response.

The Crucial Differences: Reasoning vs. Standard Models

The contrast between prompting reasoning models and standard LLMs boils down to a few key differences:

1. Simplicity vs. Detail: OpenAI's reasoning models perform better with simpler prompts, while standard models often benefit from more detailed, step-by-step instructions.
   
   
2. Chain-of-Thought: OpenAI advises against explicit chain-of-thought for their reasoning models, Anthropic actively recommends it (with XML tags), and standard models generally benefit from it for complex tasks.
   
   
3. Examples: OpenAI's reasoning models often prefer zero-shot prompting (no examples), while Google's Gemini, Anthropic's Claude, and most standard models benefit from examples that guide the model's reasoning.
   
   
4. Context Management: In retrieval-augmented generation, OpenAI recommends limiting context to only the most relevant information, while Google and Anthropic emphasize providing sufficient contextual information.
   
   
5. Output Formatting: While OpenAI's reasoning models can maintain consistency, structured output requirements might be better suited for standard LLMs. Anthropic recommends XML tags for structuring outputs.
   
   

Platform-Specific Prompt Engineering Masterclass

Now, let's get tactical about how to prompt each platform's reasoning models effectively.

OpenAI Prompt Engineering Reasoning Models

1. Keep It Simple: Trust the model's internal reasoning without micromanaging. "What's the square root of 144?" works better than "Think step by step and explain how you would calculate the square root of 144."
   
   
2. Use Delimiters: When providing complex inputs, use delimiters like triple quotation marks, XML tags, or section titles to help the model parse different components.
   
   
3. Limit Context in RAG: Provide only the most relevant context in retrieval-based tasks. Summarizing three relevant sections is more effective than asking the model to process ten pages.
   
   
4. Be Specific About Constraints: Clearly state any constraints or parameters, such as budget, timeframe, or specific methods. "Suggest a digital marketing strategy for a startup with a $500 budget focused on social media" is more effective than "Suggest a marketing strategy."
   
   
5. Start with Zero-Shot: Begin with zero-shot prompting (no examples). If the initial output doesn't meet expectations, then incorporate a few highly relevant and simple examples.
   
   

Google Gemini 2.0 Prompt Engineering

1. Provide Clear Instructions: Define the task, specify constraints, and outline the desired output format. Use action verbs to specify the desired action.
   
   
2. Use Examples Strategically: Include a few examples to demonstrate the desired output format or reasoning pattern. Experiment with the optimal number of examples for your specific task.
   
   
3. Include Necessary Context: Provide relevant background information, facts, data, and define key terms and concepts when needed.
   
   
4. Use Prefixes: Apply prefixes like "Question:", "Explanation:", and "Answer:" to signal different parts of the input and expected output.
   
   
5. Break Down Complex Problems: For intricate reasoning tasks, decompose the problem into smaller, more manageable steps.
   
   
6. Experiment with Parameters: Adjust temperature, top-K, and top-P to influence the randomness and creativity of Gemini's reasoning process.
   
   

Anthropic Claude Prompt Engineering

1. Be Clear and Precise: Provide unambiguous instructions that leave little room for misinterpretation.
   
   
2. Use Examples Generously: Employ multishot prompting (multiple examples) to show Claude the desired format and style of response, particularly for complex tasks.
   
   
3. Implement Chain-of-Thought: Encourage Claude to break down complex problems step-by-step using tags like <thinking> and <answer> to separate reasoning from the final output.
   
   
4. Structure with XML Tags: Use XML tags to clearly delineate different parts of the input, such as instructions, context, and questions.
   
   
5. Define Roles When Helpful: Assign specific roles for Claude to adopt through system prompts, providing a framework for its reasoning approach.
   
   
6. Prefill Responses: Start the response for Claude to guide it toward the desired output format or reasoning direction.
   
   
7. Chain Prompts for Complex Tasks: Break intricate tasks into a sequence of prompts, using the output of one prompt as the input for the next.
   
   

Avoiding Common Pitfalls When Prompting

Even the best reasoning models have limitations. Here are some common challenges and how to address them:

1. Ambiguous Prompts: Provide precise instructions, leaving no room for misinterpretation.
   
   
2. Over-Reliance: Remember that while powerful, these models aren't infallible sources of truth. Always critically evaluate their outputs.
   
   
3. Contextual Limitations: Focus on providing the most relevant context and break down complex tasks to manage context effectively.
   
   
4. Inconsistent Outputs: Test prompts rigorously and refine them based on feedback. For critical applications, request source citations or use models with self-checking capabilities.
   
   
5. Multi-Step Logic Challenges: For models where it's effective, use chain-of-thought prompting to guide complex logical deductions.
   
   
6. Unsolvable Problems: Be aware that reasoning models might attempt to answer even inherently unsolvable problems. Include instructions to identify such cases or ask for clarification.
   
   

‍

The Architecture Behind the Approach

The differing optimal prompting strategies across platforms aren't arbitrary—they reflect fundamental differences in model architecture and training.

The extensive use of reinforcement learning in training OpenAI's models for enhanced reasoning, including internal "chains-of-thought," explains why explicit chain-of-thought prompting in the user prompt is often unnecessary or even detrimental—the model is already doing this internally.

Similarly, the very large context windows of models like OpenAI's o1 and o3-mini allow for substantial amounts of information in the prompt, but the recommendation to limit context in RAG suggests that relevance is more important than sheer volume.

Personality Rubrics: The Secret Sauce

Let's get into something truly game-changing—personality rubrics. Think of these as digital masks that transform your AI into a specific character or expert. It's not just a gimmick; it's a power move for specialized tasks.

Ever notice how talking to a real SEO expert feels different from chatting with a generalist? That's what personality rubrics recreate. They strip away the AI's tendency to be a jack-of-all-trades and force it to embody a specific expertise—whether that's SEO wizardry, conversion-focused copywriting, or data analysis.

These prompts might look bizarre at first glance—lengthy character descriptions and oddly specific instructions—but they work magic. They essentially tell the AI: "For this conversation, you're not just any assistant; you're the world's foremost expert on X with Y personality traits."

The results? Content that feels like it came from a specialist rather than an all-purpose AI. Your SEO prompts produce laser-focused keyword strategies. Your copywriting requests return persuasive hooks that would make Don Draper proud.

One crucial tip: When using these personality rubrics with models like GPT-4o or o3-mini, create a temporary chat. This prevents the AI from getting stuck in character permanently, which can lead to some entertainingly bizarre but ultimately frustrating interactions down the line.

This approach isn't just effective—it's honestly fun. There's something delightful about watching your AI suddenly transform into a sardonic marketing genius or a methodical data scientist with strong opinions about spreadsheet organization. If you want to try a prompt like this you should head to our Free Online Community where we have one called “Sparkle Copywriter”, this guy writes very well… and I’ll leave it for you to try it out.

‍

The Final Word

The emergence of reasoning models represents a significant evolution in the AI landscape. As one analysis notes, this shift is "from mere linguistic fluency towards systems capable of more profound cognitive tasks," requiring a re-evaluation of established prompting methodologies.

There's no one-size-fits-all approach to prompting these sophisticated systems. OpenAI's reasoning models favor simplicity and directness, Google's Gemini benefits from structure and examples, and Anthropic's Claude thrives with chain-of-thought prompting and XML tags.

The key is understanding each platform's unique characteristics and adapting your prompting strategy accordingly. As reasoning models continue to evolve, ongoing experimentation will undoubtedly reveal even more effective ways to unlock their full potential.

Now go forth and prompt wisely. Your AI's reasoning capabilities are only as good as the prompts you feed it.

‍

With SearchGPT transforming the landscape of search engines by combining powerful generative AI with traditional search, digital marketers must rethink their SEO strategies. Unlike traditional keyword-based search engines, SearchGPT emphasizes natural language processing (NLP) and conversational content. To optimize for SearchGPT, your content must clearly answer complete questions, adopt a conversational tone, and be technically structured for AI crawlers. This involves prioritizing comprehensive answers, clear metadata, structured data (schema.org markup), fast website performance, and ensuring easy crawler accessibility.

Let's dive deeper into how to effectively optimize your content specifically for SearchGPT.

Understanding SearchGPT and its SEO Requirements

SearchGPT is OpenAI’s innovative search engine designed to deliver direct, conversational answers using generative AI technologies. Traditional keyword-based SEO alone won’t work here—you’ll need strategies tailored specifically for conversational search.

Essential SEO Practices for SearchGPT

Create Conversational, Comprehensive Content

SearchGPT understands context, natural language, and user intent better than traditional search engines. To rank well, your content needs to align closely with natural conversational patterns.

Best practices:

• Structure content around full questions and complete answers.
• Integrate conversational keywords and phrases.
• Create detailed, authoritative answers that directly address user intent.

For example, instead of targeting "SEO tips," optimize for phrases like "How can I optimize content for SearchGPT?" or "What's the best way to rank content on SearchGPT?"

Personal Insight:

In my experience, diversifying your content formats significantly improves SEO outcomes. Rather than relying solely on written blogs, incorporating videos, podcasts, or infographics ensures broader appeal and higher engagement, aligning perfectly with the conversational nature of SearchGPT.

Technical Optimization for AI Crawlers

SearchGPT relies heavily on technical structure, as its AI crawlers differ from traditional bots.

Key technical SEO factors include:

• Clean, structured HTML or Markdown: SearchGPT has limited JavaScript crawling capabilities, so a logical HTML structure ensures complete indexing.
• Metadata: Clear titles, descriptions, and publication dates help SearchGPT quickly evaluate content relevance.
• Optimized response times: Ensure your website loads quickly—AI crawlers have strict timeout constraints (usually 1-5 seconds).

Structured Data and Metadata

Implementing schema.org markup helps SearchGPT precisely interpret content, improving its ability to serve your content directly to users.

Recommended structured data includes:

• Article markup (title, author, publication date)
• FAQs markup (clearly marking questions and concise answers)
• Product or service details (price, availability, reviews)

Building Authority Through Backlinks

Backlinks remain essential, signaling credibility to SearchGPT’s AI-driven algorithms.

Effective link-building strategies include:

• Creating exceptional, shareable content.
• Establishing collaborations and partnerships with authoritative sites.
• Actively seeking editorial links from reputable sources.

FAQs: Optimizing for AI and Traditional Search

How to rank on Bing search engine?

Since SearchGPT reportedly uses Bing’s index, optimizing for Bing can significantly enhance your SearchGPT visibility:

• Prioritize strong domain authority and quality backlinks.
• Optimize content with clearly structured metadata and schema markup.
• Focus on user experience metrics like page load speed and user engagement signals.

How to rank on ChatGPT?

ChatGPT prioritizes direct answers from credible, structured sources:

• Provide concise, direct answers to common user queries.
• Include Q&A structures explicitly.
• Ensure your content is easily summarized by AI models.

How to optimise for SearchGPT?

• Create conversational, Q&A-style content.
• Ensure fast load times and structured HTML.
• Implement schema.org markup to clarify content type.
• Provide transparent and verifiable source citations.

Future-Proofing SEO Strategies for AI Search

AI-driven search engines like SearchGPT will continue evolving rapidly. Traditional metrics like keyword rankings will become less relevant. Instead, monitor engagement metrics such as session duration, direct engagement with content, and your site’s ability to clearly answer user queries.

Actions for continuous optimization:

• Regularly update your content based on performance metrics.
• Stay informed about AI search trends and algorithm updates.
• Adopt a test-and-learn approach, continuously adjusting your strategy.

Final Thoughts

Optimizing for SearchGPT requires thoughtful adjustments from traditional SEO, emphasizing conversational content, technical excellence, and structured data implementation. As SearchGPT continues to evolve, adopting flexible and AI-aligned SEO strategies ensures your content remains visible and valuable—effectively meeting both AI algorithms’ expectations and your users’ evolving needs.

The takeaway? Focus on user value, structure for clarity, and adapt continuously to maintain SEO success in the age of AI-powered search.

‍

The Truth About Backlinks in 2025: What Actually Works

Backlinking seems to be this black art in SEO that everybody either doesn't understand or is suspiciously quiet about. The truth is that backlinks are still very relevant in today's SEO strategy – and they absolutely should be.

Why Backlinks Still Matter

Fundamentally, backlinks are Google's way to verify whether you're trustworthy. When other websites link to yours, they're essentially vouching for you. This makes perfect sense as an important ranking metric – the more sites that trust you, the better your content probably is, so the higher you should rank. In competitive niches, if you don't have a clear backlinking strategy, good luck getting anywhere.

The Reality of Google's Stance

Google states they don't condone buying backlinks, which sounds nice on paper, but reality tells a different story. If buying backlinks didn't work, the backlinking industry wouldn't be worth billions of dollars. Services like The Hoth, Get Me Links, Rhino Rank, plus thousands of Fiverr gigs wouldn't exist. Backlinks work, and buying them (if you know what you're doing) absolutely works too.

How to Actually Get Backlinks in 2025

The "Write Great Content" Myth

Google likes to sound like a Boy Scout by saying "just write valuable content and the links will come." Sometimes this works, but mostly it's bullshit. Great content alone rarely attracts backlinks naturally.

Manual Outreach

One legitimate approach is manually reaching out to websites, saying: "Hey, I noticed you discuss X topic. I've written a detailed post about that – linking to my article would add value to your readers." This is how Google wants you to do it, but it rarely works well and requires massive manpower to implement effectively.

Featured.com and Expert Platforms

A quicker solution without spending money is using sites like Featured.com. These platforms connect publications with subject matter experts. Featured.com lets you browse questions from publishers looking for expert answers. If you provide great answers, you'll be rewarded with a backlink to your website. The free tier allows three questions monthly, though only one or two might get published due to competition.

Create Interactive Content

Building fun, useful content can attract backlinks naturally. Free tools are particularly effective. On our website, we have a free keyword research tool created specifically to drive traffic and generate backlinks. Yours doesn't need to be as sophisticated – if you sell jewelry, a simple ring size calculator could work. These tools can bring in high-quality backlinks with minimal effort.

Buying Backlinks

You can simply buy backlinks through services like The Hoth or Rhino Rank. But you need to know what you're doing – specifically how to analyze what makes a good versus bad backlink:

• Is it contextually relevant? A dog training website getting links from computer gear sites makes little sense.
• Do you want a guest post or link insertion?
• What about domain authority?

Speaking of domain authority, this metric is somewhat made up. Yes, Google has its own internal domain ranking system, but we don't know it. The domain authority scores from Ahrefs or SEMrush are their own metrics that may not match Google's evaluation.

Generally, look for websites with consistent backlink growth and organic traffic increases rather than fixating on a specific domain authority number. If they've had relatively steady growth and have a higher domain authority than yours (despite what I just said about these metrics), it's probably a decent backlink.

What If You're Clueless But Need Backlinks?

If you don't know what you're doing but need backlinks and lack time, I personally recommend GetMeLinks. Full disclosure: I know these guys and have worked with them extensively.

Unlike The Hoth or RhinoRank, Get Me Links offers human interaction without requiring huge budgets. You can schedule a 15-minute call to discuss strategy, making it a collaborative process. They provide monthly reports showing what backlinks they've secured, and regular meetings keep you involved in the strategy.

Do You Actually Need a Backlinking Strategy?

It depends on your niche's competitiveness. In the wedding industry in Sydney, Australia? You'll need serious backlinks to rank well in such a competitive space with established players. Your options are spending on backlinks or Google Ads – either way, your wallet will feel it.

But if you're a dog trainer in a small Idaho town with only one competitor, you can probably rank without an extensive backlink strategy.

I hope this has been valuable. If you want a full video tutorial on building backlinks yourself, check out my recent guide linked below.

‍

Leveraging AI for Keyword Research in 2025: A Smart Approach

I think by now, you probably know or feel that if you're not using AI to leverage nearly every aspect of your work, you're really missing out. And keyword research is no exception. In fact, I'd take it a step further and say that using AI for keyword research can really give you the edge and is something you should be doing today.

Why We Need Keyword Research

First off, let's understand why keyword research is fundamental. There are a few key problems that proper keyword research solves for us:

Finding the Right Keywords

Keyword research facilitates choosing the correct terms to focus on.

For example, we might think our audience is looking for "Professional dog training services," but when we do a little keyword research, we discover golden opportunities like "canine training services," which has nearly the same search volume but significantly lower competition. This allows us to get more bang for our buck with the work we do.

Matching User Intent

We need to ensure that the keywords on our pages actually match what users are searching for.

Consider this: if we're a SaaS company offering project management software, we might use terms like "project management software" or "professional SaaS project management software" on our page. But users might actually be searching for "office work task manager" or "office work task tracker tool."

These might seem like odd keyword choices, but if that's how your audience searches, you need to understand that through keyword research. It's all about how your potential audience is searching for your products or services.

‍

Maximizing Keyword Research with AI

I hear this question a lot:

"Can I do keyword research with ChatGPT?" Or "Can you do keyword research with any AI tool?"

The answer is yes and no. You can do keyword research, or better yet, you can do keyword idea research with ChatGPT. We need to understand that fundamentally, GPT, Claude, and Gemini don't have access to keyword research data such as search volume, keyword difficulty, cost per click, and other metrics—so they won't give you that data.

What these models will give you is a really good idea of potential keywords to explore, which you can then verify have sufficient search volume. I prefer to use large language models as a way to organize keyword research into an easy-to-follow, step-by-step strategy.

The Problem with Traditional Keyword Research

Many people get stuck at the data collection stage. They're happy they purchased Ahrefs or SEMrush, they do loads of keyword research, and then... what next? That's where they get stuck.

How do you implement keyword research into a strategy? That's where large language models come into play.

A Practical Approach to AI-Powered Keyword Research

Step 1: Use AI Models to Generate Keyword Ideas

Before diving into data collection, start with AI to brainstorm potential keywords. This is where models like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini shine. You can prompt them with questions like:

"What keywords might someone use when looking for [your product/service]?""Generate alternative ways to describe [your offering]""What are niche-specific terms related to [your industry]?"

These models have been trained on vast amounts of internet content and can suggest terminology you might not have considered. For example, if you run a fitness studio, beyond obvious terms like "gym" or "fitness center," an AI might suggest "functional training space," "boutique workout studio," or "group exercise classes near me."

The key here is to cast a wide net and collect as many potential keyword ideas as possible without worrying about metrics yet.

Step 2: Gather Data to Validate Your Keywords

Now that you have a robust list of potential keywords, it's time to validate them with actual data.

You can use tools like Ahrefs, but lately, I'm preferring Data for SEO's API because they make things more affordable while maintaining high quality. I'll show you a video below where I demonstrate an automation that gets all the keyword research you need absolutely free, as Data for SEO is giving everyone (or at least my followers) $5 of free API credit, which is more than enough for what you need.

This step is crucial because it tells you which of your AI-generated keyword ideas actually have search volume, how competitive they are, and what their potential value might be.

‍

Step 3: Make Sense of the Data

Once you have your data set, you need to make sense of it all. This is where large reasoning models come into play.

By giving the model background on what it's supposed to do with the keywords, it can transform the keyword "mumbo jumbo numbers" into actionable insights. Here's how:

1. Give the large language model an understanding and background of the business it's working for (context)
2. Provide it with your keyword research
3. Ask it to tell you how to implement these keywords on your website

You can then have a productive back-and-forth conversation with the model. It might tell you how to better optimize your on-page SEO by integrating one keyword instead of another, because it now has the correct data to make a data-driven approach.

Summary: The AI Keyword Research Process

So fundamentally, we're using AI for three key purposes:

1. Generate keyword ideas: Use large language models to brainstorm potential keywords without worrying about metrics
2. Get data for those keywords: Use tools like Data for SEO to validate these keywords with actual search volumes, difficulty scores, and other metrics
3. Organize and interpret the data: Feed that data back to reasoning models like OpenAI's GPT-4.5 or Claude 3.7 to organize and make sense of it all

Let the AI do the heavy lifting for you. That's the best way to do keyword research with AI in 2025.

‍

How Hyper-Localized SEO Pages Generated 99+ Monthly Appointments With Zero Ad Spend

‍

The Challenge

Getting found online is tough for small businesses these days. If you're not spending a fortune on ads, you're basically invisible, right? Well, not exactly. One of our community members, Steven, proved you can dominate local search without spending a dime on advertising. His client was struggling to get noticed online until they tried something different - our hyper-localized SEO approach that changed everything.

Meet Steven B. Marks

Steven joined our online community and leveraged our templates to transform his client's local search visibility. What makes his story particularly compelling is that he didn't just get a temporary boost – he created a sustainable organic traffic machine.

The Results: By The Numbers

The results speak for themselves:

• 99 booked appointments in January 2025 through the website from organic traffic only
• 97 booked appointments in February 2025
• 0 paid ads run during this period – all traffic purely organic
• Growth from 127 indexed pages to 740 indexed pages in just 90 days
• Client now facing the "good problem" of needing to expand capacity to handle lead volume

The Strategy: Hyper-Localized SEO Pages

Here's how Steven implemented our approach:

1. Location-Service Matrix

Rather than creating generic service pages, Steven developed a comprehensive matrix:

• Each service the client offers (emergency plumbing, hot water installation, kitchen sink installation, etc.)
• Each location they serve (not just the main city, but every individual suburb)

So instead of just "Plumbing Services in Melbourne," he created pages like:

• "24-Hour Emergency Plumbing in Brunswick"
• "Hot Water Installation in Fitzroy"
• "Kitchen Sink Plumbing in Fitzroy North"

2. Automated Local SEO Pages Process

The key to making this scalable was automation:

1. Perplexity AI to conduct detailed research about each specific location
2. Custom GPTs trained to write specialized sections using the location research
3. Structured templates that maintain consistency while ensuring each page contains unique, valuable content
4. Make platform to generate the entire automation workflow using click-and-drag functionality

The entire process is built in Make, a click-and-drag automation software, which allows us to replicate the workflow for any business with minimal effort. This means the same system that generated 99+ monthly appointments can be quickly implemented for other clients in different industries.

3. Strategic Implementation

Steven didn't just dump hundreds of pages onto Google at once:

• Pages were indexed gradually to appear natural to search algorithms
• Each page was strategically interlinked within the site structure
• The content directly matched search intent by addressing the specific service needs in each location

Why This Approach Works

Perfect Search Intent Match

When someone searches for "hot water installation in Brunswick," they land on a page that exactly matches their search intent. This precision dramatically increases conversion rates because the potential customer finds exactly what they're looking for.

Google Rewards Quality Location Content

These pages rank well because:

• They contain genuinely researched local information
• They avoid duplicate content issues by being specific to each location
• They provide valuable service information tailored to local needs

Scale Without Sacrificing Quality

By breaking down the content creation into specialized sections with different custom GPTs handling each part, Steven avoided the common pitfall of AI content – hallucinations or generic filler. Each component is tightly controlled to maintain quality while still allowing for automation.

The Client's Current "Problem"

In Steven's own words from February 28th:

"Now as of today we had 97 appointments online for Feb! More testimonial material mate!"

The client now faces the enviable challenge of having to expand their business to handle the influx of new leads – something every service business owner dreams of.

Key Takeaways

1. Hyper-localization works: Creating specific service pages for each location creates a perfect match for search intent
2. AI automation makes it scalable: Using the right AI tools makes it possible to create hundreds of high-quality pages
3. Breaking down the process is crucial: Separate custom GPTs for different sections ensures quality control
4. Gradual indexing is important: Building up page count naturally avoids potential penalties
5. Interlink strategically: These pages don't need to be in main navigation but should be connected within the site

As Steven shared in his January 31st update:

"500+ City Service Pages created and indexed in 60 days 🔥🚀... For the month of January we had 99 booked appointments through the site, does not include phone call bookings... best month this client has ever had... and we are just getting started :)"

Conclusion

This case study demonstrates that effective SEO doesn't have to be mysterious or expensive. With the right strategy and tools, you can create a powerful organic traffic engine that delivers qualified leads month after month without ongoing ad spend.

By leveraging automation intelligently while maintaining quality and relevance, Steven was able to achieve what many consider impossible in today's SEO landscape – dramatic organic growth that directly impacts the bottom line.

The strategy isn't just about creating more pages – it's about creating the right pages that perfectly match what potential customers are searching for in their specific locations.

Ready to build your own hyper-localized SEO machine? Join the AI Ranking Skool community today and get everything you need to replicate these results. You'll receive all the assets and files to build these exact automations, plus get hands-on support every step of the way. Don't just read about SEO success stories – become one.

‍

‍

‍

Let's cut to the chase. The big players have been flexing AI muscles in their marketing game for years. Now? That power's in your hands too. As a small business owner, you've got a rare window to jump on AI in digital marketing before your competition wakes up.

I've been in the trenches with this stuff. We use AI to crack open Google Search Console data like a cold one, getting insights in minutes that used to take days. And content creation? We're pumping out stuff that ranks for those juicy long-tail keywords at a pace that would've been fantasy without AI backing us up.

Let me walk you through how this tech is reshaping marketing, the practical ways you can start using it today (without a PhD in computer science), and what happens if you get ahead of the curve.

How AI is Changing the Marketing Game Right Now

The marketing landscape isn't what it was even two years ago. According to research from Marketing Hire, AI has already automated about 40% of the grunt work—data entry, scheduling social posts, sorting customers into buckets. That means you get to focus on the good stuff: telling your brand's story and designing campaigns that hit different.

For you as a small business owner, this is huge. Tasks that once required either hiring someone or dropping serious cash on agencies can now happen with a few clicks.

The Sweet Spots Where AI is Making Moves

1. Content Creation That Doesn't Suck

Creating fresh, engaging content used to be the ultimate time-sink. Now AI tools can:

• Draft blog posts that don't read like a robot wrote them
• Whip up social captions that sound like you on your best day
• Suggest headlines people actually want to click
• Tune up your existing content to climb search rankings

We've used AI to create content targeting niche keywords our team would never have had time to cover. The human touch is still crucial for editing, but the AI handles the heavy lifting.

2. Data Analysis Without the Headaches

You don't have the luxury of a data science team. AI fills that gap by:

• Spotting patterns in how people interact with your business
• Flagging which marketing channels are wasting your money
• Predicting which content will hit and which will flop
• Catching trends before your competitors do

We've slashed our analysis time using AI to dig through Google Search Console data. What took days of spreadsheet hell now happens while you grab coffee.

3. Customer Experience That Feels Personal

People expect personalized experiences now. AI makes this possible even without a massive team:

• Chatbots that don't sound like robots
• Product recommendations that actually match what people want
• Email campaigns that adapt based on how people engage
• Website content that changes depending on who's visiting

According to Consultus Digital, by 2026, we'll have AI generating video ads tailored to a viewer's mood, detected through their wearable devices. Wild, right?

AI Marketing Tools You Can Start Using Tomorrow

Here's the toolkit small business owners should have on their radar—no computer science degree required.

SEO and Content Tools That Deliver

Customer Tools That Make You Look Bigger Than You Are

This is just the beginning. A Huble Digital report projects that by 2026, 60% of marketers will spend more than half their time training AI models rather than executing campaigns. The marketing game is changing fundamentally.

Small Businesses Already Winning With AI

The Boutique That Punches Above Its Weight

A clothing shop with just two employees started using an AI-powered inventory and marketing system. Check the results:

• Overstocked inventory down 32%
• Email marketing conversion up 45%
• Repeat customers up 28%

The owner now laughs about how the AI pays for itself many times over by preventing inventory blunders and matching products to the right customers.

The Accounting Firm That Became a Content Machine

A small accounting firm used AI to analyze client data and automate content creation:

• Created targeted blog posts for specific client niches
• Built a chatbot that handles basic tax questions
• Automated social posting based on when their audience is actually online

They saw qualified leads from organic search jump 67% in six months, while spending less time on marketing, not more.

Why You Need to Move Now, Not Later

The marketing world is shifting under our feet. Sprout Social's analysis shows AI is replacing entry-level data-crunching roles while creating new positions that blend AI oversight with creative skills.

For you as a small business owner, this creates a perfect opportunity. Get comfortable with these tools now, and you'll have a serious edge. Wait too long, and you'll be playing catch-up.

The Next Big Waves Coming Your Way

1. Hyper-Personalization That Feels Magical

AI can now analyze tiny patterns in how customers behave, enabling marketing that feels personally crafted. Tools like Optimove already use machine learning for "segment-of-one" campaigns, where each customer gets recommendations based on their real-time browsing and buying signals.

This means small businesses can create customer experiences that feel as personalized as the big players—maybe even more so.

2. Marketing to the Machines

Here's where it gets weird (in a good way). Improvado spotted a trend where we're increasingly marketing to AI systems that buy stuff automatically. Think ad platforms that analyze campaign performance and shift budgets without a human clicking anything.

You'll need to optimize your digital presence not just for human eyeballs, but for algorithmic buyers too. That means highlighting technical specs alongside the emotional appeal.

3. Voice Search Taking Over

Smart speakers and voice assistants are changing how people find businesses. Industry data shows that pros focusing on voice search optimization saw 40% salary bumps after 2024 as smart speakers became the go-to for local searches.

For small businesses, optimizing for voice isn't optional anymore—it's how people will find you when they're looking for what you sell.

Getting Started: The No-BS Gameplan

Step 1: Figure Out Where You Stand

Before diving into AI tools, take a quick inventory:

• Which channels actually bring you business?
• What marketing tasks eat up your time without much payoff?
• Where are you flying blind without good data?

This helps you identify where AI will give you the biggest immediate wins.

Step 2: Level Up Your Knowledge (Without Going Back to School)

No technical background needed. These free resources will get you up to speed:

1. Elements of AI: This free course breaks down AI concepts without the jargon, covering practical marketing applications.
2. AI Marketing: A program that teaches you AI-powered customer analysis, chatbot setup, and the ethical side of automated marketing.
3. Salesforce Trailhead: Free modules on Einstein AI for automating customer relationship management.

Step 3: Start With One AI Tool That Solves Your Biggest Headache

Don't try to overhaul everything at once. Pick one tool that addresses your biggest pain point:

• If creating content is your bottleneck, start with Jasper AI
• If customer service is overwhelming you, get a chatbot going
• If data analysis is consuming too much time, use an AI analytics platform

Master one thing before moving to the next. This prevents overwhelm and lets you see concrete results.

Step 4: Develop Skills That Make You Stand Out

According to Huble, the marketers who'll thrive combine AI knowledge with three key human skills:

1. Data Storytelling: Translating AI-generated numbers into stories that make sense to customers
2. Ethical AI Oversight: Making sure your AI tools aren't making biased or problematic decisions
3. Cross-Domain Collaboration: Bridging the gap between tech tools and creative marketing

Small business owners who develop these hybrid skills will have a massive advantage in the AI marketing landscape.

Common Worries (And Why They Shouldn't Stop You)

"I'm not a tech person."

Most modern AI marketing tools are designed for people who can't code. They have drag-and-drop interfaces that are about as complicated as setting up a social media account. Start with user-friendly tools and build from there.

‍

"AI tools cost too much for my small business."

Many AI tools have extremely affordable tiered pricing, and a lot of the best AI tools available are open source, meaning you can use them completely for free. One of my favorites in this case is DeepSeek R1 and Deep Seek V3, which are completely free AI tools that rival even the flagship AI models like OpenAI's O1 and Anthropic's Sonnet 3.7.

‍

"I don't want to lose the human touch in my marketing."

AI should handle the boring stuff so you can focus on building real connections. Use AI for data analysis and repetitive tasks, freeing your time for strategy and relationships—places where humans still crush it.

‍

"I don't have time to learn new tools."

Think of it as an investment. The hours you spend learning AI tools will save you hundreds of hours down the road. Start with just 1-2 hours a week dedicated to AI skills.

The Real Deal: How We Use AI for SEO

One of our biggest AI wins has been in SEO data analysis. Before, we'd spend days manually picking through Google Search Console data, trying to spot patterns and opportunities. We'd miss insights simply because there's only so much information a human brain can process.

After bringing in AI tools to analyze this data, we can:

• Quickly spot content that needs a tune-up
• Find keyword opportunities before competitors pounce
• See which content formats get people to stick around
• Make smart decisions in minutes instead of days

We've also leveraged AI for content creation, helping us target long-tail keywords at scale. Each individual long-tail keyword might bring modest traffic, but together, they've become our secret weapon for qualified leads.

The AI doesn't replace our expertise—it amplifies it. We still provide the strategy and quality control, but the AI handles the heavy lifting, letting us do much more without hiring an army of specialists.

If you want a detailed, free guide on how to do SEO with AI in 2025 using mostly free AI tools, you can check out our free playlist on YouTube, which I’ll leave linked below.

Bottom Line: The Train's Leaving the Station

AI in marketing isn't some far-off future scenario—it's happening right now. Small business owners who get comfortable with these tools today will have serious advantages over those who wait.

As AI takes over the repetitive parts of marketing, you get to focus on strategy, creativity, and genuine connections with customers. That's actually good news for small businesses, which often excel at authenticity and quick pivots.

I've personally seen the use of AI tools completely change people's businesses and help them generate more leads than they ever dreamed of. This is a bit of a self-promotion for our community, AI Ranking, but recently, Will, who is an expert in the financial services niche, used AI tools and automations in a way that got him ranking not only number one on Google My Business for his keyword in his local area but also number one in the SERP results. This was after just four weeks of learning how to use these AI tools correctly.

The tools and resources in this post give you easy entry points, even if you're not a tech whiz. Start small, focus on measurable wins, and gradually build your AI capabilities.

The question isn't whether your small business should use AI for marketing, but how quickly you can get these tools working for you before your competition does.

Ready to make your first move? Try one of the free courses above, or grab a trial of an AI marketing tool that solves your biggest headache. Your future self will thank you.

‍

In a significant leap forward for artificial intelligence, Anthropic has unveiled Claude 3.7 Sonnet, a groundbreaking model that represents their first hybrid reasoning system. This advancement comes at a pivotal moment in the AI race, with major players continuously pushing the boundaries of what large language models can achieve. Let's dive deep into what makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet special, how it compares to competing models, and why it might represent the future of AI reasoning.

Understanding Hybrid Reasoning: Claude 3.7 Sonnet's Core Innovation

Claude 3.7 Sonnet's most distinctive feature is its hybrid reasoning approach. Unlike previous models that operated in a single mode, 3.7 Sonnet combines two complementary thinking approaches:

1. Quick Response Mode: For straightforward queries requiring immediate answers
2. Extended Thinking Mode: For complex problems requiring step-by-step reasoning

This dual capability mimics human cognitive processes more accurately than previous iterations. Humans naturally switch between quick intuitive responses and slower, more deliberate thinking depending on the complexity of the task at hand. Anthropic's research shows this approach significantly enhances performance across various domains, particularly in tasks requiring logical reasoning and problem-solving.

According to The Verge, this represents a fundamental shift in AI design philosophy, addressing one of the persistent limitations of earlier models: the inability to slow down and think through complex problems methodically.

Technical Advancements and Capabilities

Extended Thinking and Self-Reflection

Perhaps the most revolutionary aspect of Claude 3.7 Sonnet is its ability to engage in self-reflection before responding. This process, sometimes referred to as "chain-of-thought reasoning," allows the model to:

• Break down complex problems into manageable steps
• Consider multiple approaches before selecting one
• Catch potential errors in its own reasoning
• Develop more robust solutions to challenging problems

This capability has shown particular strength in domains requiring rigorous logical thinking such as mathematics, coding, and physics. TechCrunch reports that this extended thinking mode can continue as long as necessary to solve complex problems, rather than being artificially limited to a certain number of steps.

My Experience with Claude 3.7 Sonnet

In my recent tests with Claude 3.7 Sonnet, its content creation abilities are truly phenomenal. It requires minimal prompting to produce natural-sounding SEO content compared to other AI models.

What's particularly impressive is its coding capability. The interactive HTML element you see embedded in this post below was created by Claude 3.7 Sonnet in seconds. This visualization helps readers understand the hybrid reasoning concept while providing an engaging experience.

‍

Another remarkable example was when I asked it to code a hybrid game combining Snake and Space Invaders. Claude delivered a functional game almost instantly. While the gameplay was admittedly challenging, the fact that it created a working game without needing any implementation corrections speaks volumes about its programming abilities.

These experiences demonstrate how Claude 3.7 Sonnet's hybrid reasoning approach translates to real-world applications, making it an exceptional tool for both content creation and development tasks.

‍

Enhanced Coding Abilities

Software development is one area where Claude 3.7 Sonnet demonstrates remarkable improvement. According to AWS, the model excels in real-world coding scenarios by:

• Producing more robust, bug-free code
• Handling complex programming tasks with greater accuracy
• Better understanding code context and requirements
• Explaining its programming decisions in detail

This improvement is complemented by the introduction of Claude Code, a command-line tool that allows developers to delegate coding tasks directly from their terminal. This agentic approach to coding could significantly impact developer productivity and workflow integration.

Expanded Output Capacity

Claude 3.7 Sonnet offers over 15 times the output capacity of its predecessor, Claude 3.5 Sonnet. This expanded capability enables:

• Generation of longer, more comprehensive documents
• Development of more complex code bases
• Creation of detailed analyses with multiple components
• Extended conversational exchanges without losing context

This improvement addresses a significant limitation of previous models and makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet more versatile for enterprise applications.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs. Other Leading Models

Understanding how Claude 3.7 Sonnet stacks up against other flagship models helps contextualize its innovations. The following comparison examines key performance areas across major competitors:

Comparison with Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Dev.to's analysis indicates Claude 3.7 Sonnet maintains the strengths of 3.5 Sonnet while addressing its limitations. Claude 3.5 Sonnet already performed admirably on reasoning tasks, but 3.7 takes this further with:

• More sophisticated problem-solving capabilities
• Improved accuracy on complex tasks
• Better handling of ambiguous instructions
• Reduced hallucinations when reasoning through challenging problems

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs. GPT-4o

The comparison with OpenAI's GPT-4o is particularly interesting. Vellum's benchmarking of earlier Claude models against GPT-4o showed mixed results, with GPT-4o excelling in latency and throughput while Claude models performed better on certain reasoning tasks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet appears to narrow this gap significantly. According to Venture Beat, the hybrid reasoning approach gives Claude 3.7 Sonnet an edge in complex problem-solving scenarios, while maintaining competitive performance in everyday tasks.

CNBC reports that Anthropic claims Claude 3.7 Sonnet is its "most intelligent AI model yet," suggesting substantial improvements across the board.

Real-World Applications and Optimization

An important distinction highlighted by AWS's blog is Claude 3.7 Sonnet's optimization for real-world applications rather than just competitive benchmarks. This focus makes it particularly well-suited for:

• Enterprise software development
• Scientific research requiring logical reasoning
• Business analysis with complex variables
• Educational applications needing step-by-step explanations

This practical focus differentiates Claude 3.7 Sonnet from models that may perform well on academic benchmarks but struggle with real-world variability and complexity.

Availability and Integration

Claude 3.7 Sonnet's release is accompanied by robust integration options. It's now available on:

• Amazon Bedrock, making it accessible to AWS's extensive customer base
• Google Cloud's Vertex AI, expanding its reach to Google Cloud users

This multi-cloud availability strategy helps position Claude 3.7 Sonnet for widespread adoption across various sectors and use cases.

The Significance of Hybrid Reasoning

The introduction of hybrid reasoning in Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents more than just an incremental improvement. According to Axios, it signals a fundamental shift in how AI models approach problem-solving.

Traditional models operate in a single mode, often prioritizing either speed or accuracy. The hybrid approach allows Claude 3.7 Sonnet to dynamically adjust its cognitive resources based on the task at hand. Engadget describes this as thinking "both fast and slow," referencing psychologist Daniel Kahneman's influential work on human cognition.

This approach has several important implications:

1. Improved Reliability: By applying the appropriate reasoning mode to each task, Claude 3.7 Sonnet reduces errors in complex scenarios while maintaining efficiency for simpler ones.
2. Enhanced Transparency: The extended thinking mode makes reasoning more visible and interpretable, allowing users to better understand how the model arrived at its conclusions.
3. Resource Efficiency: Quick responses for straightforward tasks conserve computational resources, while extended thinking is deployed only when necessary.
4. Closer Alignment with Human Reasoning: This dual-mode approach more closely mimics how humans switch between intuitive and analytical thinking.

The Future of AI Reasoning

Claude 3.7 Sonnet's hybrid reasoning approach may well represent the future direction of AI development. As reported by France24, this model is positioned as Anthropic's "smartest AI model" to date, setting a new standard for reasoning capabilities.

The Reddit community has been actively discussing the implications, with some speculation about how significant the improvements will be over previous versions. Early reactions suggest the hybrid reasoning approach may be particularly valuable for developers and researchers who require both quick responses for routine tasks and deeper analysis for complex problems.

Perhaps most significantly, AboutAmazon's coverage suggests Claude 3.7 Sonnet could fundamentally change how businesses integrate AI into their operations, enabling more sophisticated applications that require genuine reasoning rather than pattern matching.

Conclusion: A New Era for AI Reasoning

Claude 3.7 Sonnet represents a significant milestone in the evolution of AI reasoning capabilities. By successfully implementing a hybrid approach that combines quick responses with extended, methodical thinking, Anthropic has created a model that addresses one of the fundamental limitations of previous AI systems.

This advancement comes at a crucial time in the AI industry, as companies and researchers increasingly focus on improving reasoning capabilities rather than just scaling up model size. The ability to engage in self-reflection and methodical problem-solving brings AI one step closer to the kind of deliberate thinking that humans employ when faced with complex challenges.

‍

If you’re an SEO agency owner or a small business trying to improve your search rankings on your own, you might have wondered how to make your AI-generated content feel more human. In this post, we explore practical strategies that help ChatGPT generate text that’s warm, relatable, and perfectly tuned for SEO. We’ll also share a personal experience using Otter.ai to capture natural language, then asking ChatGPT to mimic that tone as closely as possible. The goal is to boost your SEO results while maintaining a friendly, authentic voice throughout your content.

In The Ever Evolving World Of... just joking.

Using ChatGPT for content creation has become popular among businesses seeking to scale their digital marketing efforts. However, if the language comes off as too robotic or generic, it may fail to engage your readers. I’m sure you have read a sentence that starts with ‘In the ever-evolving world of {insert topic}’ and recognized instantly that this was 100% written by ChatGPT. In this guide, we break down step-by-step how to enhance the naturalness of ChatGPT’s output, tailor its tone, and seamlessly integrate SEO best practices to improve organic search rankings.

We’ll start with why natural language matters in SEO, and then walk you through actionable tips and real-life examples. Along the way, we’ll reference trusted resources like SEO London and PanAmerik to back up our recommendations. Whether you’re generating blog posts, meta descriptions, or landing pages, these techniques will help you create content that reads as if a human wrote it.

The Importance of Natural Language in SEO

Natural language is more than just friendly—it helps search engines understand your content better. Modern algorithms focus on user experience and engagement. When your text feels genuine, visitors are more likely to spend time on your page, which can lead to higher rankings. Additionally, it increases the chances of being sourced on Generative Engines (GEO) like Search GPT, Perplexity, and even Google's AI Overviews, as the more natural it sounds, the more likely the AI is to use your wordings directly.

How Natural Language Boosts Engagement

• Reader Connection: When your content sounds conversational, readers feel like they’re having a discussion rather than reading a scripted lecture. This connection leads to longer on-page time and lower bounce rates.
• Algorithm Signals: Search engines track user behavior. A text that resonates with your audience can indirectly signal quality to search engines.
• Credibility and Trust: Writing that reflects a personal tone builds trust. People are more likely to follow advice that feels authentic.

Using natural language in your content aligns with modern SEO practices (Generative Engine Optimisation) and helps build a loyal audience that trusts your brand.

Strategies to Humanize ChatGPT’s Output

Transforming ChatGPT’s output to sound more natural involves a few key strategies. The following sections provide practical methods to refine your AI’s tone and style.

1. Crafting the Right Prompts

The magic happens at the prompt stage. The clearer and more specific your instructions, the more naturally ChatGPT will generate the desired output. Here are some ideas:

Use Conversational Prompts

When writing your prompt, try to ask for a tone that feels like a friendly conversation. For example:

• “Explain how to improve SEO using simple language that sounds like you’re chatting with a friend.”
• “Write an article that feels like a story, including personal insights and casual language.”

Another great strategy is to create a 'negative keyword list.' This is a list of keywords and phrases you would like the AI to avoid when writing. You should keep adding to your own list as you use AI more and more so that the list is specific to your taste in overall words and phrases. If you need a starting list, you can copy ours from HERE.

These types of prompts encourage the AI to produce content that isn’t overly formal or mechanical.

Provide Contextual Background

To ensure your AI-generated text has depth and relevance, include details that frame the topic. For instance, you could say:

• “Write a blog post for small business owners who are new to SEO. Share simple tips and personal experiences to make the content approachable.”

Context helps ChatGPT choose the right vocabulary and structure.

2. Mimicking Your Tone Using Transcriptions

One innovative technique I’ve used is recording my ideas on Otter.ai and then asking ChatGPT to mimic that transcription’s tone. Here’s how it works:

Step-by-Step Process

1. Record Your Thoughts: Use Otter.ai to record your natural speaking style as you discuss SEO topics.
2. Transcribe and Review: Let Otter.ai transcribe your recording, then review and tweak the transcription if needed.
3. Instruct ChatGPT: Feed the transcription into ChatGPT with a prompt like, “Write a blog post on making ChatGPT sound more natural, using the tone from this transcription.”

This method leverages your natural voice, ensuring the final content resonates with your audience. My own experiments with this approach have helped create content that feels both personal and professional.

3. Experimenting with Sentence Structure, Pacing, and Content Variety

A mix of short and long sentences contributes to a natural flow. Here are some tips:

• Vary Your Sentence Length:
  • Short Sentences: Use these for clear, impactful statements.
  • Longer Sentences: Use these to provide detailed explanations or build a narrative.
• Use Active Voice:
  • Instead of: “The post was written by the AI,”
  • Say: “The AI wrote the post.”
• Add Content Variety with Tables:
  • Including tables as supporting content throughout your blog post not only breaks up large text blocks but also enhances readability and user experience.
  • Creating tables in ChatGPT is easy and can be used to summarize comparisons, features, or key takeaways.

This approach makes the text more lively and easier to understand while giving readers a break from a text-heavy blog. Additionally, it enhances the overall SEO of the page by improving EEAT (Expertise, Experience, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness). By referencing credible sources and linking to where you got your information, you increase the likelihood that search engines will recognize and rank your content higher.

4. Incorporating Hyperlinks Strategically

Hyperlinks add credibility and improve SEO. When you reference a source, use contextually relevant anchor text. For example:

• “Learn more about natural language improvements on SEO London.”
• “Read about innovative AI strategies at PanAmerik.”

By embedding hyperlinks naturally within the content, you provide additional resources without cluttering the page.

5. Utilizing Tables for Data and Comparisons

Tables are a great way to present comparisons or key data points visually. They break up the text and make the information more digestible. Below is an example table comparing traditional content creation and AI-assisted methods:

AspectTraditional Content CreationAI-Assisted Content CreationSpeedSlower, manual draftingFaster, near-instant draftsTone ConsistencyDepends on individual writerCan be adjusted using tone promptsSEO IntegrationRequires separate optimizationIntegrated with keyword promptsCustomizationHighly personalized but time-consumingEasily adjusted with clear instructionsCost EfficiencyGenerally higherMore cost-effective in scale

This table highlights the benefits of leveraging ChatGPT while maintaining a natural tone.

Personal Experience: Using Otter.ai for Authentic Tone

I’ve personally explored this approach to improve the authenticity of my content. When I started using Otter.ai to capture my spontaneous ideas, I noticed a significant change in how my writing felt. The transcriptions maintained my natural cadence, casual phrases, and genuine enthusiasm, which I then instructed ChatGPT to replicate.

Benefits Observed

• Increased Engagement: Content felt more relatable and kept readers interested longer.
• Consistency in Voice: Even when the AI drafted the text, it retained my unique style.
• Efficient Workflow: The process of recording ideas and letting the AI refine them saved time while ensuring quality.

Final Thoughts

Making ChatGPT sound more natural is not just about tweaking language—it’s about crafting an authentic voice that resonates with your readers and aligns with your SEO goals. By carefully designing prompts, leveraging transcription tools like Otter.ai, keeping your own 'negative keyword list' and applying thoughtful editing, you can create content that feels genuine and engaging.

For SEO agency owners and small businesses, this hybrid approach offers a scalable way to produce high-quality content. You can achieve faster turnaround times without sacrificing the personal touch that sets your brand apart. As you experiment and refine your process, you’ll find that the blend of AI efficiency and human authenticity can significantly boost your search rankings and audience engagement.

If you like these types of strategies and want to take AI-driven SEO to the next level, I encourage you to join AI Ranking. Our community is dedicated to simplifying SEO and helping business owners leverage AI and automation to maximize search engine optimization. Whether you're just starting out or looking to refine your process, AI Ranking provides the tools and insights to help you stay ahead in the evolving digital landscape.

‍

Let’s talk about on-site SEO. You’ve probably heard it’s the foundation of ranking well, but here’s the kicker: most people either overcomplicate it or skip half the steps. Today, we’ll break it down into four simple categories—design, loading times, metadata, and image SEO—and show you how to ace each one with free AI tools. No jargon, no fluff. Let’s dive in.

1. Design: Make Your Website Actually Convert

If your website looks like a 2005 MySpace page or confuses visitors the second they land, even perfect SEO won’t save you. Why? Google loves websites that solve problems. If users bounce because your site is clunky or unclear, Google notices. Plus, what is the point of a website ranking #1 if it does not convert.

The Fix:

• Keep it stupidly simple. Does your homepage have a clear heading and one obvious call-to-action (like “Buy Now” or “Book a Free Consult”)? If not, simplify.
• Use Google’s AI Studio (Gemini 2.0 Flash). Share your screen with this AI for 10 minutes (it’s free!), and it’ll critique your design like a brutally honest friend. Pro tip: Set the prompt to “Analyze my website’s design for conversion rate optimization” before sharing.

How To Use Google AI Studio To Optimise Your Website

1. Go To Google AI studio and make yourself a free account
2. Once logged in select the ‘Stream Realtime’ icon from the left hand side
3. In the Model settings, make sure Gemini2.0 Flash Experimental is selected
4. Insert THIS prompt into the ‘System Instructions’ section. This will make gemini act like an SEO professional and save you time having to explain to it what you are trying to do.
5. Hit the Share your Screen button and head to the website you need help optimising
6. Ask Gemini to roast your website, but make sure the advice is actionable

Remember that you only have 10 minutes to talk to Gemini in this stream real time so make sure you have your questions ready to go.

2. Loading Times: Speed Isn’t Just for Race Cars

Google’s Core Web Vitals now directly impact rankings. But beyond SEO, slow sites cost you money:

• 1-second delay = 7% drop in conversions (Amazon lost $1.6B/year from a 1s lag).
• 53% of mobile users abandon sites taking >3s to load.
• “Cached” vs. Real-World Speed: Your browser saves files (like CSS/images) after your first visit, making your site feel fast. New users get the un-cached version (the truth).

‍‍

Step 1: Test Like a Pro (But Free)

GTmetrix vs. PageSpeed Insights:

• GTmetrix (my go-to):
  
  • Tests from 7 global locations.
  • Shows waterfall charts (exactly what loads first/last).
  • Grades from A-F (aim for A/B).
• PageSpeed Insights:
  
  • Google’s own tool.
  • Focuses on Core Web Vitals (LCP, FID, CLS).
  • Prioritizes mobile (60% of traffic).

How to Use GTmetrix:

1. Go to GTmetrix.com > Enter your URL > Analyze.
2. Check the Performance Tab:
   
   • Largest Contentful Paint (LCP): Time to load main content (aim <2.5s).
   • Total Blocking Time (TBT): How long the page feels “frozen” (aim <200ms).
3. Waterfall Chart: Hover over red/yellow bars – these are slow elements.

Step 2: Decode the Gibberish

GTmetrix/PageSpeed reports are full of terms like “defer offscreen images” or “eliminate render-blocking resources.” Here’s what they actually mean:

Example Report Translation:

• GTmetrix Suggestion: “Defer unused CSS.”
• What You Do: Install a plugin like Autoptimize (WordPress) to delay non-critical CSS.

‍

Step 3: Use the Custom GPT to Skip the Headache

1. Download your GTmetrix/PageSpeed report as a PDF.
2. Go to this Speed Report Translator GPT (custom GPT I made just for you ;-)).
3. Upload the PDF and ask:
   
   • “List the top 3 fixes for my site, sorted by easiest to hardest.”
   • “How do I fix ‘reduce unused JavaScript’ without breaking my site?”

‍

3. Metadata: Your Secret Sales Pitch

Let’s cut through the noise: metadata isn’t just “SEO paperwork.” It’s your website’s elevator pitch to Google and users. Get it right, and you’ll boost clicks, rankings, and conversions. Here’s how to nail it with free AI tools.

Why Metadata is Your Secret Weapon

• Title Tags: Google’s #1 ranking factor for relevance. Think of it as your page’s “book title.”
• Meta Descriptions: Not a direct ranking factor, but a click magnet. A good one can double your CTR.
• Headings (H1/H2): Organize content for users + tell Google what matters.

The Problem: Most people either keyword-stuff (“Best Pizza Chicago Pizza Best Pizza”) or write vague fluff (“Innovative Solutions”).

Step 1: Audit Your Metadata with SEO Wallet

Install the Free Chrome Extension:

1. Go to SEO Wallet (free tier works).
2. Click “Add to Chrome” > Pin it to your toolbar.

Analyze Your Page:

• Open any webpage > Click the SEO Wallet icon.
• Overview Tab:
  
  • Title Tag: Check if it’s under 60 characters and includes your main keyword (e.g., “Best Deep-Dish Pizza in Chicago | Tony’s Pizzeria”).
  • Meta Description: Ensure it’s under 150 chars with a CTA (“Craving authentic Chicago deep-dish? Order now – 20% off first order!”).
• Heading Optimization Tab:
  
  • Verify your H1 matches the title tag (don’t duplicate – keep it natural).
  • Check if H2s include secondary keywords (e.g., “Our Secret Dough Recipe” > “Chicago-Style Deep-Dish Crust Recipe”).

Pro Tip: For local SEO, add your city/region and primary keyword to the title tag.

Example:
❌ “Tony’s Pizzeria – Taste the Difference”
✅ “Best Deep-Dish Pizza in Chicago | Tony’s Pizzeria”

‍

Step 2: Generate Killer Metadata with Gemini

Use Case 1: Title Tag Brainstorming

• Prompt:
  “Generate 5 title tag variations for my pizza shop’s homepage. Main keyword: ‘Chicago deep-dish pizza.’ Include location, a benefit, and keep it under 60 characters.”
• Gemini Output:
  1. Chicago Deep-Dish Pizza | Family-Owned Since 1985 | Tony’s
  2. Best Deep-Dish Pizza in Chicago – Oven-Fresh Daily
  3. Authentic Chicago Deep-Dish Pizza – 20% Off First Order”

Use Case 2: Meta Description Magic

• Prompt:
  “Write a meta description that is between 150-160 characters in length for my pizza shop’s ‘Catering’ page. Include keywords ‘Chicago deep-dish catering’ and ‘office parties.’ Add urgency.”
• Gemini Output:
  “Need crowd-pleasing food for your Chicago office party? Our deep-dish catering delivers oven-fresh pizza in 60 mins. Book now – limited slots!”

Use Case 3: Fix Awkward Headings

• Before: “Our Delicious Pizza” (vague).
• Prompt:
  “Rewrite this H2 (‘Our Delicious Pizza’) to include ‘Chicago deep-dish’ and sound more enticing.”
• Gemini Output:
  “Chicago Deep-Dish Pizza: Handmade Daily With Local Ingredients”

Step 3: Avoid These Common Mistakes

1. Keyword Stuffing:
   
   • ❌ “Best Pizza Chicago Best Deep-Dish Pizza Chicago Pizza Restaurant”
   • ✅ “Best Deep-Dish Pizza in Chicago | Tony’s Pizzeria”
2. Ignoring Mobile Snippets:
   
   • Google truncates titles/meta descriptions on mobile. Put keywords FIRST.
   • Example:
     “Tony’s Pizzeria | Best Deep-Dish Pizza in Chicago” → Mobile: “Tony’s Pizzeria | Best Deep-Dish Pizza…”
3. Duplicate Metadata:
   
   • Use SEO Wallet’s “Duplicate Check” feature (under Advanced Tools).

‍Your Metadata Checklist

✅ Title tag: 50-60 chars, keyword in first half.
✅ Meta description: <150 chars, CTA, no fluff.
✅ H1: Matches page intent, no keyword stuffing.
✅ H2s: Include secondary keywords naturally.
✅ Local SEO: City + keyword in title (if applicable).

Real-World Before/After

Before:

• Title: “Welcome to Tony’s Pizza | Chicago”
• Meta Description: “We serve pizza in Chicago. Visit us today.”

After (AI-Optimized):

• Title: “Best Chicago Deep-Dish Pizza | Family Recipe Since 1985 | Tony’s”
• Meta Description: “Craving authentic Chicago deep-dish? Tony’s handmakes oven-fresh pizza daily. Dine-in or order now – 20% off first pickup!”

Metadata isn’t about tricking Google – it’s about clarity. Use AI to say more with less, and watch your clicks (and crusts) rise.

4. Image SEO: Lightweight & Descriptive Wins

Images slow down sites and often get ignored SEO-wise. But done right, they boost rankings and accessibility.

The Fix:

• Ditch PNGs. Use WebP files—they’re 30% lighter with no quality loss. Convert images for free with Squoosh.app.
• Rename files from “IMG_1234.png” to “chicago-deep-dish-pizza.webp”.
• Alt tags: Describe the image and include keywords. Example: “Freshly baked deep-dish pizza with melted cheese” > “deep-dish pizza chicago.”

Final Thoughts

On-site SEO isn’t about ticking boxes—it’s about making your website useful, fast, and stupidly easy to understand. With free tools like Gemini AI, GTmetrix, and SEO Wallet, you don’t need to be a tech wizard. Just focus on the basics, let AI handle the heavy lifting, and watch Google (and your visitors) thank you.

Need a visual walkthrough? Check the video below. Questions? Drop a comment—we’ll keep it simple. 🍪

(P.S. If you’re still using PNGs, we need to talk.)